The City of Goshen, and many other cities, are facing a lack of or a reduction in revenue and the need to reduce spending. A reduction in spending leads to hard choices in deciding what services are most important and/or essential to the functioning of a city.
One issues citizens of Goshen are currently facing is to either pay a $5 monthly trash fee or to cut funding for employees and/or programs. One suggested plan of action, presented to Mayor Kauffman, is to cut the funding for six or seven employee positions and two programs. Two of the positions proposed for elimination are the city forester and a vacant park maintenance position. This concerns me because the benefits provided by the trees of our urban forest are greater than the money we would save by cutting these two positions. For example one tree provides an average benefit of $87.71 in the reduction of stormwater runoff and the improvement of property values to name a few.
The potential savings to the City, if the proposed cuts are implemented, would be between $234,500 to $249,500, but the net benefit the City receives from its public trees is $833,231 annually. Are we willing to cut positions and funding for short-term gain or are we willing to pay a bit more for long-term quality of life? Park Superintendent Sheri Howland said if the city forester position is cut, there’s no one to take care of the trees. If we begin to lose our public trees due to lack of care, the monetary benefits provided by our public trees will be transferred to the city increasing the budget constraints we already face.
I would gladly pay a monthly trash fee to ensure the quality of life we currently enjoy as citizens of Goshen.
— Jason Kauffman
Goshen
Letters to the Editor
Trees have an economic impact
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Remember the amnesty law of ’86?
The “Gang of Eight” U.S. Senate members have drafted an immigration bill that’s worse then the amnesty bill signed into law by Ronald Reagan in 1986. S. 744 gives those here illegally instant Registered Provisional Immigrant status, which means they are free from being deported if they register for amnesty.
-
Don’t ignore signs of someone contemplating suicide
Everyone has issues that they have to deal with in their lives. It’s when we become overwhelmed and our issues become so drastic that they are unbearable that the results can be catastrophic. Suicide is a desperate attempt to escape suffering that has become unbearable.
-
Why do immigrants come to the U.S. illegally?
With the current increased interest in fixing our broken immigration system both political parties are putting forth legislation.
-
Safety along C.R. 35 is a concern
This letter is meant to bring awareness and hopefully corrections in regard to C.R. 35 in Elkhart County. Something needs to be done immediately to enforce the laws pertaining to the use of C.R. 35.
- Emphasis on gun control makes you wonder
-
Goshen should stick with ‘Redskins’
I must respond to the letter to the editor from Mr. Ron Chupp (The Goshen News, May 9). What’s in a name, Mr. Chupp? I too have a Native American heritage, and for some reason, I am not offended by the term Redskins, or brown skins or any other color of skins.
-
More important issues than a nickname
I would like to, in the most respectful way possible, respond to Mr. Chupp’s letter (The Goshen News, May 9) regarding the ongoing debate over the term “Redskins” being used as the nickname and mascot for the Goshen school system.
-
There is hope through God
May I share what happened to me after praying about the issue of whether to have guns carried by school authorities at Goshen High School. While calling out to God, my question was: Why have we as a nation come to trusting in government agencies, such as Homeland Security, rather than obeying the Constitution in what you have declared through our forefathers?
-
Sheriff has this reader's support
This letter is in defense of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and in response to Shari Mellin’s letter (The Goshen News, May 8) about Sheriff Brad Rogers not obeying the laws related to anti-gun legislation
-
‘Redskins’ nickname is offensive
The question posed (in the May 5 edition) was, “What’s in a Name?” In the case of the GHS (Redskins) mascot, it is insult, degradation, racism, and an ongoing slap-in-the face reminder of the disgusting manner in which my Native American ancestors were treated by Europeans.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Remember the amnesty law of ’86?




