Editor:
On July 30 you printed a letter to the editor by a Mr. David A. Shepard who attempted to make a case for eliminating our property taxes and replacing them with graduated income taxes. Among several excellent points made by Mr. Shepard was the statement that, “If property tax exists it can raise again.” I personally believe that Mr. Shepard has hit the nail squarely on the head.
Among all the proposals that have been offered to date to provide us with “meaningful property tax relief,” nearly all of them amount to nothing more than Band-Aid therapy. One such proposal tossed around over the last few weeks, as reported in The Goshen News, proposes to cut property taxes by as much as 30 percent through a combination of tax adjustments and credits.
Great. What this means is that our property taxes will be back to where they were before we suffered this most recent, painful increase. With sales and income taxes somewhat higher, the property tax will simply have a new base from which to rise in the years ahead. This is completely unacceptable.
I believe there is another good justification for eliminating property taxes. For one thing, property taxes are based on the ultimate value of a property if it were to be sold and not on an individual’s ability to pay the tax.
A widow or a single mother with children might be sitting on a property that has become quite valuable but have limited income. The value of a farmer’s land near an expanding urban area can soar but his income from farming can be quite modest. What is he supposed to do?
The fairest tax is a graduated income tax. The size of a person’s annual income can be easily and readily measured and is probably the most accurate way to assess his or her ability to pay tax.
Most ironically, on the same page with Mr. Shepard’s letter, there was also a column by Morton Marcus titled “Property Tax Needed.” There have been times in the past when I have disagreed with Mr. Marcus and that is most certainly the case again this time.
Among many of the points espoused by Mr. Marcus was the statement that “Unsubsidized property taxes help constrain urban sprawl.” I wonder if Mr. Marcus has any concrete, verifiable evidence to support this theory. I personally suspect that the exact opposite may be the case. Urban sprawl causes land values near large cities to soar and farmers or other landowners hurt by the tax are encouraged to sell, usually to a housing developer. Furthermore, exorbitant property taxes encourage homeowners to move farther out into the distant suburbs or “exurbs” in search of communities with lower (for a while) property taxes.
The best course of action, in my opinion, would be an amendment to the Indiana State Constitution that would remove the right of the state and local governments to collect property taxes. Lawmakers would then have no choice but to find alternate and fairer ways to raise money and, if necessary, make some cuts where appropriate. Just such an amendment has been presented to the Indiana Legislature. The time has clearly come for bold action. We need real action and not more Band-Aids.
Fred M. Cain,
4830 S. 500 West
Topeka
Letters to the Editor
Eliminate property taxes in Indiana
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Goshen sidewalk crowding is the new cruising
I’m writing in response to the article in The Goshen News (May 16), entitled “Way Paved for Sidewalk Ordinance.” To recap quickly: The older people (business owners, the Establishment, “The Man”, the 1 percent) in Goshen don’t like the younger people crowding the sidewalk during First Fridays.
-
A 'compassionate conservative?'
You’ve all heard the term “compassionate conservative” used by liberals. They called George W. Bush a compassionate conservative, among other things. Have you ever noticed how liberals love to label people?
-
Partisanship OK in Congress, but not in other elected offices
During the primary election season there was much discussion regarding whether bipartisanship is a positive or negative attribute as it relates to the work of the United States Congress. When I speak to students, I often mention the vital role of partisanship within the legislative branch of government.
-
Elkhart County community's help appreciated
On behalf of the Child And Parent Services Board of Directors, staff and the families we serve, our heartfelt thanks go out to the generous people of Elkhart County.
-
Why not just close Main Street?
I thought Goshen spent millions of dollars just a few years ago to widen and increase Third Street to two-way traffic and make Fifth Street a two-way street so that traffic flow on Main Street would be greatly reduced. So, why can’t the Goshen City Council address the problem of the number of people at First Fridays by closing the downtown section of Main Street for one afternoon/evening per month and allowing people to congregate on the street?
-
Sponsors help First Fridays thrive
Last month, more than 150 volunteers, 30 city staff members, and 16 sponsors donated time, talent and treasure to make the event a success. First Fridays simply would not exist without the good will and hard work of many individuals coming together.
-
Proving Rush Limbaugh wrong?
We can confirm that President Obama has officially broken Rush Limbaugh’s heart by achieving the success that Rush wished against. Remember after the 2008 election when Rush famously hoped our new president would not be successful? Well the evidence is insurmountable that Mr. Obama has gotten the best of Rush.
-
Shelters should neuter animals
This letter is on the subject of neutering animals, especially cats.
-
Mourdock is bought and paid for
It is sad to watch, but once again the Tea Party has been duped by big business and banks into supporting causes and people who will do harm to the rank and file in the Tea Party.
-
America cannot afford another Republican president
Remember 2001 and how President George W. Bush inherited the biggest federal surplus in postwar history? The Congressional Budget Office even projected the federal government would be debt-free by 2009. The country was in terrific fiscal shape to deal with any crises or emergencies in the future, even ready to handle the retirement of the Baby Boom generation.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Goshen sidewalk crowding is the new cruising



