In the Saturday Goshen News, I read about the cuts to the city budget proposed by Councilman Tom Stump in order to be able to pay for residential trash collection out of the general city budget.
While I am not clear on where all the cuts come from, the large majority seem to come park and recreation. One rationales for these cuts is that the city should first make paying for services that all the residents use out of the general budget a priority before funding items that some or a few residents use.
While there is a certain logic to this, in practice we pick and choose which services are covered under the general tax revenue and which we are charged for if we live in Goshen. Street maintenance, leaf and brush pick-up are covered under general revenue, while water and sewer are not.
There is a certain logic to this as well. While it would be hard to measure usage for streets and brush and leaf disposal and assign fees it is possible to measure how much water/sewer we use or indeed how much trash we each set out. You could argue that trash fee is even fairer since businesses who contribute to the general fund through their property taxes subsidize residential trash collection while having to pay privately for theirs.
We asked for this when we voted for property tax caps that are now in effect in Indiana. Imagine a brochure for Goshen touting some of the best schools in the state, parks and trails throughout the city for all to use, a great library, vibrant downtown and events that attract a cross-section of our residents and surrounding comminutes. Now imagine a brochure that states we offer free trash collection. You choose.
— Dana Miller
Goshen
Letters to the Editor
Trash service or everything else?
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Remember the amnesty law of ’86?
The “Gang of Eight” U.S. Senate members have drafted an immigration bill that’s worse then the amnesty bill signed into law by Ronald Reagan in 1986. S. 744 gives those here illegally instant Registered Provisional Immigrant status, which means they are free from being deported if they register for amnesty.
-
Don’t ignore signs of someone contemplating suicide
Everyone has issues that they have to deal with in their lives. It’s when we become overwhelmed and our issues become so drastic that they are unbearable that the results can be catastrophic. Suicide is a desperate attempt to escape suffering that has become unbearable.
-
Why do immigrants come to the U.S. illegally?
With the current increased interest in fixing our broken immigration system both political parties are putting forth legislation.
-
Safety along C.R. 35 is a concern
This letter is meant to bring awareness and hopefully corrections in regard to C.R. 35 in Elkhart County. Something needs to be done immediately to enforce the laws pertaining to the use of C.R. 35.
- Emphasis on gun control makes you wonder
-
Goshen should stick with ‘Redskins’
I must respond to the letter to the editor from Mr. Ron Chupp (The Goshen News, May 9). What’s in a name, Mr. Chupp? I too have a Native American heritage, and for some reason, I am not offended by the term Redskins, or brown skins or any other color of skins.
-
More important issues than a nickname
I would like to, in the most respectful way possible, respond to Mr. Chupp’s letter (The Goshen News, May 9) regarding the ongoing debate over the term “Redskins” being used as the nickname and mascot for the Goshen school system.
-
There is hope through God
May I share what happened to me after praying about the issue of whether to have guns carried by school authorities at Goshen High School. While calling out to God, my question was: Why have we as a nation come to trusting in government agencies, such as Homeland Security, rather than obeying the Constitution in what you have declared through our forefathers?
-
Sheriff has this reader's support
This letter is in defense of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and in response to Shari Mellin’s letter (The Goshen News, May 8) about Sheriff Brad Rogers not obeying the laws related to anti-gun legislation
-
‘Redskins’ nickname is offensive
The question posed (in the May 5 edition) was, “What’s in a Name?” In the case of the GHS (Redskins) mascot, it is insult, degradation, racism, and an ongoing slap-in-the face reminder of the disgusting manner in which my Native American ancestors were treated by Europeans.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Remember the amnesty law of ’86?




