There need not be hand-wringing over the upcoming election. Indeed, the election doesn’t have to come down to a heart-rending decision. We have two starkly different options in front of us:
• On one side there is the belief that it’s primarily the wealthy who will look out for the good of society. On the other side there’s the belief that government has a legitimate role in looking out for the good of society, especially “the least of these” whom Jesus talked about in Matthew 25 of the New Testament.
• One side believes that government should be insignificant in the affairs of a country, while the other side believes that government—in cooperation with the private sector and faith-based organizations—has a necessary role to play in the affairs of a country.
• One side believes that government mainly inhibit its citizens from succeeding, while the other side believes that government can and does help its citizens succeed.
• One side believes we need an almost totally free market for a healthy economy, while the other side believes we need to smartly regulate the market for a healthy economy.
• One side believes in trickle-down economics, while the other side believes in rise-up economics.
• One side believes that cutting the taxes of the wealthy is the right thing to do, while the other side believes that expecting the wealthy to pay a somewhat higher percentage in taxes (as they did in America’s prosperous, budget-surplus 1990s) is the right thing to do.
While there are genuinely good people on both sides of the aisle, their views about the proper role of government could not be more different. This makes our decision on Nov. 6 an easy one.
— Nathan Shenk
Goshen
Letters to the Editor
This decision isn’t difficult
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Safety along C.R. 35 is a concern
This letter is meant to bring awareness and hopefully corrections in regard to C.R. 35 in Elkhart County. Something needs to be done immediately to enforce the laws pertaining to the use of C.R. 35.
- Emphasis on gun control makes you wonder
-
Goshen should stick with ‘Redskins’
I must respond to the letter to the editor from Mr. Ron Chupp (The Goshen News, May 9). What’s in a name, Mr. Chupp? I too have a Native American heritage, and for some reason, I am not offended by the term Redskins, or brown skins or any other color of skins.
-
More important issues than a nickname
I would like to, in the most respectful way possible, respond to Mr. Chupp’s letter (The Goshen News, May 9) regarding the ongoing debate over the term “Redskins” being used as the nickname and mascot for the Goshen school system.
-
There is hope through God
May I share what happened to me after praying about the issue of whether to have guns carried by school authorities at Goshen High School. While calling out to God, my question was: Why have we as a nation come to trusting in government agencies, such as Homeland Security, rather than obeying the Constitution in what you have declared through our forefathers?
-
Sheriff has this reader's support
This letter is in defense of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and in response to Shari Mellin’s letter (The Goshen News, May 8) about Sheriff Brad Rogers not obeying the laws related to anti-gun legislation
-
‘Redskins’ nickname is offensive
The question posed (in the May 5 edition) was, “What’s in a Name?” In the case of the GHS (Redskins) mascot, it is insult, degradation, racism, and an ongoing slap-in-the face reminder of the disgusting manner in which my Native American ancestors were treated by Europeans.
-
Millrace projects threaten a Goshen gem
The city of Goshen is in the 11th hour for the five Redevelopment Commission members to hear the voices of its residents concerning the millrace redevelopment proposals at its next meeting at 4 p.m. on May 14.
-
We don’t need a community center
We want to keep this short and to the point. We keep reading articles and letters in the papers about the proposed community center in Goshen. Our question is why?
-
Freedom-loving Americans want our country back
We are living in unprecedented times. The “America” of today is not the America that many of us grew up in.
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Safety along C.R. 35 is a concern
Probe Begins After Conn. Commuter Trains Crash
NTSB Begins Investigation Into Conn. Train Crash
Lotto Fever Sweeps the Country
Conn. Commuter Trains Collide; 60 Go to Hospital
Coffee Run Leads to Hatchet Hitchhiker Arrest
Fmr. IRS Head Insists No Politics in Targeting
CDC: Fecal Bacteria Common in Swimming Pools
$1 Million in Jewels Stolen at Cannes Film Fest
NM Mom Chases Down Child Abductor
Raw: Crash Sends Car Into Fla. Pool
Raw: Obama Sits Down With Elementary Kids
Raw: Bear Falls From Tampa Tree
Ousted IRS Chief: Errors Not Caused by Politics
Terror Suspect Due in Court in Idaho Friday
Raw: Driver Ejected From Truck, Over Bridge
Could Tobacco Be the Next Biofuel?
Wash. State Releases Draft Rules for Legal Pot
Dying Man's Blinks Lead to Murder Conviction
Officials: Texas Tornado Likely Had 200 Mph Wind
Brothers Arrested in NOLA Parade Shooting
